Main Article Content

Abstract

Mathematics has an important role for improving attitudes and behavior through critical thinking. The learning method that can be applied to improve critical thinking skills is the dialogue method. Dialogue activities will provoke students to be more active in learning and educators can gather information, generate responses, focus students' attention, and test students' understanding. Socrates and Paulo Freire are two important figures who apply the dialogue method in learning. This research aims to describe the philosophical review of Socrates' dialogues and Paulo Freire's dialogues and their implementation in learning mathematics. The research method used is qualitative with library research. The result of this study is that the researcher found that the dialogue method can create an interesting and interactive classroom atmosphere. Through the dialogue process, educators can facilitate students to hone and improve their critical thinking skills

Keywords

critical thinking Freire Socrates dialogue method

Article Details

How to Cite
Maysun, M., Hakim, L. E. ., & Aziz, T. A. . (2023). OVERVIEW OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS: DESCRIPTION OF THE DIALOGUE METHOD OF SOCRATES AND PAULO FREIRE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING. Tesseract: International Journal of Geometry and Applied Mathematics, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.57254/tess.v1i1.6

References

  1. Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. York: Dialogos
  2. Alro, Helle & Skovsmose, Ole. (2003). Dialogue and Learning in Mathematics Education. Denmark: Kluwer Academic Publisher
  3. Amin, A. M., Aloysius Duran Corebima, Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2019). The correlation between metacognitive and critical thinking skills at implementing four learning strategies in animal physiology lectures. European Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 9, No.1, pp. 143–163. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.143
  4. Atmojo, F. M. & Danawak, Y. (2022). Tinjauan Filsafat Metode Dialog Socrates dan Implementasinya Terhadap Pembelajaran Matematika. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika. Vol.5, No.7, pp. 44-49.
  5. Conklin, H. G. (2007). Methods and the middle: elementary preservice teachers’ view in preparing to teach Middle School social studies. Research in Middle Level Education, 31(4), 1-16
  6. Damayanti, I., Yuniarti, T., Widyastuti. (2015). Deskripsi disposisi berpikir kritis matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran socrates kontekstual. Jurnal pendidikan Matematika UNILA. Vol. 3, No. 4
  7. Darwis, M. (2016). Paradigma baru pendidikan dalam perspektif pemikiran Paulo Freire. FITRA. Vol.2, No.2, pp 62–68
  8. Delić, H. & Bećirović, S. (2016). Russian Federation European Researcher. Vol. 111, No. 10, pp. 511-517. https://doi.org/10.13187/er.2016.111.511
  9. Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory Into Practice. Vol. 32, No.3, pp. 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594
  10. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Meaningful assessment: a manageable and cooperative process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
  11. Mahendrawan, E., Yanuarti, M., & Asmarawati, E. (2021). Kritik Terhadap Kemutlakan Filsafat Matematika. Scientia Sacra: Jurnal Sains, Teknologi Dan Masyarakat, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 7–12
  12. Nugraheni, MM. Y. & Wati, G. H. (2022). Matematika dan Dialog: Tinjauan Filsafat Matematika dan Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika. Vol. 5, pp. 8-13
  13. Nugraheni, N., Rochmad, & Isnarto. (2021). Aliran Humanis dalam Filsafat Matematika. Prisma, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, Vol. 4, pp. 393–396.
  14. Pahlavi, S. R., Sutriyono, S., & Prihatnani, E. (2014). Pengaruh Metode Socrates Dalam Pembelajaran Bangun Datar Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas Vii Smp Kristen Satya Wacana Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014. Satya Widya. Vol.30, No.1, pp. 28.
  15. Picciano, A. G. (2009). Blending with Purpose: The Multimodal Model. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology. Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 4-14
  16. Prastowo, A. I. (2020) Konsep Konsientisasi Paulo Freire dan Relevansinya Terhadap Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal SUHUF. Vol.32, No.1, pp. 1-13
  17. Sadewo, Y. D., Purnasari, P. D., & Muslim, Suyitno. (2022). Filsafat Matematika: Kedudukan, Peran, dan Perspektif Permasalahan dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Kelitbangan. Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 15-28
  18. Shih, Yi-Huang. (2018). Rethinking Paulo Freire’s Dialogic Pedagogy and Its Implications for Teachers’ Teaching. Journal of Education and Learning. Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 230-235
  19. Sholihah, D. A., & Shanti, W. N. A. (2017). Diposisi berpikir kritis matematis dalam pembelajaran menggunakan metode socrates. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika. Vol.4, No.2, pp. 1–9
  20. Sinaga, W., Parhusip, B. H., Tarigan, R., & Sitepu, S. (2021). Perkembangan Matematika Dalam Filsafat Dan Aliran Formalisme Yang Terkandung Dalam Filsafat Matematika. Sepren: Journal of Mathematics Education and Apllied, 2(2), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.36655/sepren.v2i2.508
  21. Susiani, K., & Suranata, K. (2017). Implementasi Metode Sokratik Melalui Lesson Study Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa. Indonesian Journal of Educational Counseling. Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 27–40. https://doi.org/10.30653/001.201711.4
  22. Suyitno, H., & Rochmad, R. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Filsafat Matematika melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD dengan Strategi Berbasis Kompetensi dan Konservasi. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif. Vol.6, No.2, pp. 199
  23. Syarifuddin, Lala A, & Fa’iz Azmi F. (2021) Relevansi Pemikiran Paulo Freire dengan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Gantang. Vol. 4, No.1, pp. 93-102
  24. Wulandaril. (2017). Students’ Critical thinking improvement through PDEODE and STAD combination in the nutrition and health lecture. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 110-116