Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 4, 2025
Accepted
May 5, 2025
Published
July 30, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 72 Download : 69

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the classical mastery of mathematical reasoning abilities in the STAD learning model with the RME approach and the direct learning model. Another goal is to analyze the comparison of mathematical reasoning abilities with the STAD learning model and the RME approach with the direct learning model. This is a quantitative study with a quasi-experimental design in the form of a posttest-only control design. The population is class VIII students of SMPN 3 Mertoyudan. Using the cluster random sampling technique, two classes were obtained as research samples, with class VIII C consisting of 32 students as the experimental class and class VIII D consisting of 26 students as the control class. The data analysis technique used is the Z test and the independent sample T test. The test results with the Z test, in the experimental class and control class, is accepted, meaning that the two classes have completed classically. The test results with the T test in both classes, obtained    then is rejected meaning that there is a difference in the mathematical reasoning abilities of the experimental class and control class students. After further analysis, the average value of the experimental class was while the average value of the control class was. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that: 1) the mathematical reasoning abilities of students who apply the STAD learning model with the RME approach achieve classical mastery; 2) the mathematical reasoning abilities of students who apply direct learning models achieve classical mastery; and 3) the mathematical reasoning abilities of students who apply the STAD learning model with the RME approach are better than students who apply the direct learning model.

Keywords

STAD Learning Model, RME Approach, Mathematical Reasoning Ability, Build Flat Sided Space

Article Details

License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Pandega, S. N. ., Hendrastuti, Z. R. ., & ‘Adna, S. F. . (2024). THE EFFECT OF THE STAD LEARNING MODEL WITH THE RME APPROACH ON THE MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS FLAT SIDE SPACE BUILDING MATERIALS. Tesseract: International Journal of Geometry and Applied Mathematics, 2(2), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.57254/tess.v2i2.34
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Afandi, M., & Irawan, D. (2013). Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Division Di Sekolah Dasar. Semarang: UNISSULA PRESS.
  2. Afandi, M., Chamalah, E., & Wardani, O. P. (2013). Model Dan Metode Pembelajaran Di Sekolah. Semarang: UNISSULA PRESS.
  3. Asmah. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Langsung Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas II SD Negeri 016 Buluh Kasap. Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), 1(1), 110-114.
  4. Astiati, S. D. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa MTS Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Geometri. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 4(3), 399-411.
  5. Dewita, N. (2019). Upaya Merubah Matematika Sebagai Pelajaran Yang Menakutkan Menjadi Pelajaran Yang Menyenangkan Di SMAN 1 Lawang Kidul. Dwija Inspira: Jurnal Pendidikan Multi Perspektif, 2(2), 201-208.
  6. Maisyarah, S., & Prahmana, R. C. (2020). Pembelajaran Luas Permukaan Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Menggunakan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia. Jurnal Elemen, 6(1), 68-88.
  7. Novikasari, I., & Wahyuni. (2019). Aplikasi Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Model STAD Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Dan Penalaran Matematis Mahasiswa PGMI. Primary: Jurnal Keilmuan dan Kependidikan Dasar, 11(2), 167-176.
  8. Octaviyunas, A., & Ekayanti, A. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Giving Question Getting Answer dan Think Share Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Siswa Kelas VII. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 341-352.
  9. Pasalbessy, C., Mataheru, W., & Ayal, C. S. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dan Penalaran Matematis. Jumadika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 16-20.
  10. Rosyidah, A. S., Hidayanto, E., & Muksar, M. (2022). Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS Geometri. JIPM: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 268-283.
  11. Saragih, T. A., & Tamba, K. P. (2022). Penerapan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Dalam Online Learning Untuk Membantu Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII. JOHME: Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education, 6(1), 57-73.
  12. Sidebang, A., Hutauruk, A. J., & Nababan, G. S. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif STAD Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Pada Materi SPLDV. LAPLACE: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 360-367.
  13. Ulya, A. L., & Agustyarini, Y. (2020). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Kelas V Pada Materi Bangun Ruang. Atthiflah: Journal of Early Childhood Islamic Education, 7(2), 21-33.
  14. Yensy, N. A. (2020). Efektifitas Pembelajaran Statistika Matematika Melalui Media Whatsapp Group Ditinjau dari Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa (Masa Pandemik Covid 19). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 5(2), 65-74.